Readjustment of Capsule Endoscopy Protocols to the COVID-19 Pandemic in a Portuguese Tertiary Center.

BACKGROUND: The prevention of severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus 2 transmission implies several social distancing mea- sures, imposing a change in the protocols of several hospital departments. Capsule endoscopy protocols changes were implemented and evaluated in a Portuguese tertiary center. METHODS: The authors compared pre-pandemic and peri-pandemic protocols, the latter favoring social distancing, used in MiroCam (IntroMedic, Seoul, Korea) and PillCam Crohn (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minn, USA) capsule endoscopy, in a Gastroenterology Department of a tertiary center. All capsule endoscopy performed in outpatients between February 2018 and September 2020 was included. The authors compared significant lesions detection rate, completeness of procedure, adequate bowel preparation, complications rate, and patient satisfaction (through a brief phone call survey) among the protocols. RESULTS: This study included 70 MiroCam CE and 43 PillCam Crohn capsule endoscopy. No statistically significant differences concern- ing performance measures and patients satisfaction were found among the pre-pandemic protocol and the peri-pandemic protocol in MiroCam capsule endoscopy. Conversely, in PillCam Crohn capsule endoscopy, the rate of complete exams was significantly inferior in the peri-pandemic protocol (84.8% vs 50.0%, P = .036), with no other statistically significant differences in the remaining parameters. CONCLUSION: The performance measures and patient satisfaction were similar among the protocols analyzed for MiroCam capsule endoscopy. Thus, the readjustment of this capsule endoscopy system, which favors a reduction in hospital stay, appears to be a good alternative to the former protocols in this pandemic era. In contrast, the rate of complete exams was significantly inferior in the adapted protocol to the pandemic era for PillCam Crohn capsule endoscopy, disfavoring its maintenance in the clinical practice.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Gastroenterology Department Activity: The Gastroenterologist's Perspective Nationwide and the Real Impact in a Portuguese Center.

BACKGROUND: Several gastroenterology societies have created recommendations in order to reduce nonessential exposure to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus. Our aim is to evaluate the national gastroenterologists' perspective on the impact of COVID-19 and the impact of reorganization of a gastroenterology department during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: For the first purpose, an online survey was distributed to gastroenterologists nationwide. For the second purpose, the authors conducted an analysis of some endoscopic procedures performed at the Gastroenterology Department of the Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho (CHVNG/E) between March 16 and May 8 during the years 2019 and 2020. RESULTS: Sixty-seven gastroenterologists answered our survey. Only 14.9% were residents and 86.6% worked in a hospital with COVID-19 patients, with 16.4% assigned to assist those patients. All of the departments suffered modifications. Ninety percent of the residents affirmed that their activity had changed. Ninety-four percent declared having nonessential endoscopic procedures postponed, and 85.1% maintained in-person medical visits, 88.1% were already having remote consultations, and 11.9% did not have any clinical visit. In our gastroenterology unit, the number of endoscopic procedures decreased by 73.1% from 2019 to 2020. In 2020, the proportion of urgent procedures was higher compared to 2019. CONCLUSION: The advent of COVID-19 has led to important changes in gastroenterology activities in Portugal, and national gastroenterology units are complying with the recommendations. Furthermore, Portuguese gastroenterologists believed that the decrease in endoscopic activity can compromise residents' education and training. The gastroenterology department at CHVNG/E has shown a significant reduction in the number of endoscopic procedures.

INTRODUÇÃO: As sociedades de Gastroenterologia criaram recomendações de modo a reduzir a exposição não necessária ao vírus da síndrome respiratória aguda grave (SARS-CoV-2). O nosso objetivo é avaliar a perspectiva nacional dos gastroenterologistas sobre o impacto da COVID-19 e avaliar o impacto da reorganização do nosso serviço de Gastroenterologia durante a pandemia. MÉTODOS: Para o 1° objetivo, um inquérito online foi disponibilizado aos gastroenterologistas de todo o país. Para o 2° objetivo, os autores realizaram uma análise dos procedimentos endoscópicos do serviço de Gastroenterologia do Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho (CHVNG/E) entre 16 de Março e 8 de Maio durante os anos de 2019 e 2020. RESULTADOS: 67 gastroenterologistas responderam o inquérito. Destes, 14.9% eram internos. 86.6% trabalharam num hospital com doentes com COVID-19, e 16.4% dos médicos prestavam cuidados a esses doentes. Todos os departamentos sofreram alterações. 90% dos internos referiram que a atividade tinha sido alterada. 94% dos médicos afirmaram que os procedimentos endoscópicos não-essenciais foram adiados. 85.1% mantinham algumas consultas médicas presenciais, 88.1% estavam a realizar consultas não presenciais, e 11.9% não tinham nenhum tipo de consulta. No nosso serviço, o número de procedimentos endoscópicos diminui em 73.1% de 2019 para 2020. Em 2020, a proporção de procedimentos endoscópicos de urgência foi superior em relação a 2019. CONCLUSÃO: A pandemia da COVID-19 conduziu a alterações importantes dentro das atividades da Gastroenterologia em Portugal, e os serviços de Gastroenterologia mostraram cumprir as recomendações. Além disso, os gastroenterologistas portugueses acreditam que a diminuição da atividade endoscópica dos internos pode comprometer a sua futura formação. O serviço de gastroenterologia do CHVNG/E mostrou uma redução significativa do número de procedimentos endoscópicos.

Patient's perspective on the implementation of measures to contain the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in a Portuguese Gastroenterology Department.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: As the COVID-19 pandemic emerged, departments had to adapt their activities, jeopardizing patient's best interests. Our aim is to evaluate the patient's perspective to the implementation of SARS-CoV-2 measures in a gastroenterology department in a Portuguese Hospital. METHODS: A survey with 13 questions was created and available to patients with at least one gastroenterology appointment at our center in the year 2019. RESULTS: Nine hundred seventy-three patients completed the survey, 51.6% (n = 502) females, and 82.6% (n = 804) with less than 65 years of age. 50.7% of 962 patients were not working. 49.5% had an appointment for monitoring a suspected or established inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). 76.8% and 69.6% subjects agreed in postponing endoscopic and non-endoscopic procedures, respectively. 93.6%, 94.3% and 95.7% patients declared to be worried about the postponing of endoscopic procedures, non-endoscopic procedures and medical visits, respectively. 88.8% supported remote consultations and 77.3% were satisfied with this type of appointment, independently of the age group (P = 0.66). 80.9% of IBD patients treated with immunosuppression or biologics were concerned about a severe infection by COVID-19. CONCLUSION: A great part of our respondents belong to IBD appointments. The majority of our patients agreed in postponing procedures, although they feel concerned. Almost all patients supported remote consultations and most patients found them positive.